It was two weeks ago that a chess game was played. Chess, not in the
literal sense, but in the intellectual gaming sense. The figurative
play of engagement to assess the true capability of the other. The
other has failed – miserably. The catch is that one does not "fail”
when being assessed per se. To fail is this sense is then the egregious
demonstration of one’s ignorance.
Two weeks ago dialog was
engaged with Liberal / Obama support groups(ies). The discussions were
based upon the mass media’s new round of claims of racism against the
Right. To make the game interesting a door was left wide open for the
Obama groupies and supporters to demonstrate that they did in fact
possess the cognitive ability of independent thought. Collectively they
failed, but to rationalize their failure they uniformly united against
racism and expressed the deplorable nature of the racist.
Why
did they do this? The media was defending Obama and the birth
certificate issue. Because the birth certificate issue had little merit
on which to defend Obama’s stubborn nature, the race card was again
played. The objective individual understands that race is utilized to
defend the political ideologies of the Obama Administration which
inherently lack the merits on which they can defend themselves. The
liberal enabler of racism only sees the claim while refusing to look at
the facts behind the claim itself.
The liberal participants
went on and on about how the Right is racist, and for a person to not
see that proved them to be blind to the reality of the existence of
racism. The problem with these statements was simple; they were in
response to comments that contained the inclusion, "racism does indeed
exist within the Right. Racism however, is not the fueling motivator of
disdain for Obama that those in the mass media and Left are making it
out to be.” Despite this, the Left simply related the vague conditions
of the article itself. A single liberal went off script and referenced
Jimmy Carter’s comments pertaining to how race was fueling the fight
against Obama. After pointing out that Cater later recanted his
statement supporting unsubstantiated claims of racism, she deleted her
comment and stopped participating in the dialog.
The
deliberate gaping hole in my approach to the dialog was simple. The
article liberal groups were tossing around as definitive proof the Right
is racist came 10 days after an incident of true racial significance
that was perpetrated by a Republican political leader closely associated
with the Tea Party! Ten days is significant in an issue like this due
the media penetration phenomenon. This is to suggest that the liberal
anti-racist who is capable of independent thought would have the ability
to connect the two. If the connection were not made at first, cued
prompting, (which was more than adequately provided) would aid in the
connection. The only light bulbs that went off were those that
immediately burned out when challenged to "think” in independent terms.
This cognitive inability to connect actual acts of racial concern to
leftist claims of racism demonstrate the unconditional submission to
hierarchy of "liberal social order.”
The problem lies in the
symbolic interactionism of the liberal subculture that has lost the
ability to "self script” outside of the conditions set by the dominate
liberal whole. This inability to script different perceptions of self
develops into the loss of self-identity outside the confines set by the
higher liberal social order. This is exactly why, as atrocious a President Obama is; he will always have these unconditional supporters
whom lack a sense of self that is beyond that of which Obama as
prescribed to them. One lower level political figure in Atlanta stated,
"Obama knows what’s best.” Such a statement epitomizes the loss of
self and the failure in the ability to identify self individuality in
the lower liberal subculture. If the dominate liberal whole makes a
claim, the subculture will in turn unconditionally submit to it.
Envision if you will, an abused other whom seeks to rationalize their
abuse in terms of their own inadequacies. Hence is the new liberal
subculture. The inept view of self has allowed its exploitation to a
social order that is granted the perception of power for being more
competent and more responsible than that of the individual self.
When dealing with the liberal subculture on race issues, they can only
articulate what the leftist media provides to them. When challenged
with the reality of Democrat racism, they completely shutdown. They can
(do as told and) finger point to unsubstantiated and vague claims of
racism stemming from the right, but will not address the tenure of the
late Senator Byrd in terms of Democrat tolerance of racism. Nor will
they address the institutionalism and glorification of racism associated
with the naming of the USS Stennis after another late racist Democrat.
There is no discussion of the KKK and the more than 100 years of the
Democrat Party fighting against civil rights will never be discussed.
Why? Because the liberal higher order will not allow the expression of
individual thought to do so.
It is not that racism does not
exist; it is that we have allowed it polarize. Through the manipulation
of the liberal subculture, the Obama Administration forces race to the
forefront and keeps it present by disallowing their followers to engage
in open discussions on racism as they pertain America and American
politics. In order for America to move forward from our sordid past on
racism, we must first be able to it address openly. Unfortunately, the
president of the "post racial America” has ensured it will not happen
under his watch. Enabling him is a group that clearly identified
themselves to be inept of self. Their concession and capitulation from
freedom finds equal guilt in America’s racial conundrum as is the
perverse act of racism itself.
Many still seem to believe America’s best days are ahead of her while they support their traditional political views enabled by same system of American political dysfunction that has led to America’s current decline.In short, without a major shift in the American voting paradigm, any hopes of a better American future are but a pipe dream facilitated by the insanity of wishing things to improve while making no adjustments to actually effort a more promising American outcome.
It is not that supporters are unaware of Santorum’s or other candidate’s fiscal histories; it is that so many are actually indifferent to fiscal history while staking claim to the call for a fiscally responsible president.So do we really give a crap about fiscal prudence or not?Are we serious when we state we want a Congress that will not infringe upon the Constitution they have sworn to protect? When it comes to practicing what we preach on the Right, the honest truth is; we fail miserably.
As of late, the Right insists on challenging the norm of America’s political elite.While this is admirable, the two party system of "us against them” serves to only limit the spectrum of debate perspectives of a given topic; Critical Perspectives was developed to draw attention to shortcomings in the often limited and often Republican controlled perspectives of the Conservative Right.
Fewer than half of Americans pay taxes, forcing more than half to now pay taxes while disposing of the income tax return economically imperials more than 50% of a nation which has a suffering economy; 70% of which is driven by consumer spending.Maybe it’s just me, but I see this as unwise.
The illusion in the Black community is power lies in the guise of victimization while Whites lie powerless under the illusion of redemption. The illusion removed reveals the Black is powerless in that Whites have no redemption. To break ranks with the role of the Black victim is to dissent for the Black community itself; a measure and expression of individuality the Black community meets with very overt animus aggression. To not envision one’s self as victim is to resist the political influences of the Democrat Party. This resistance is a demonstration of self-reliance; a forbidden Democrat attribute for Blacks to espouse.
The problem lies in the symbolic interactionism of the liberal subculture that has lost the ability to "self script” outside of the conditions set by the dominate liberal whole. This inability to script different perceptions of self develops into the loss of self-identity outside the confines set by the higher liberal social order. This is exactly why, as atrocious a President Obama is; he will always have these unconditional supporters whom lack a sense of self that is beyond that of which Obama as prescribed to them. One lower level political figure in Atlanta stated, "Obama knows what’s best.” Such a statement epitomizes the loss of self and the failure in the ability to identify self individuality in the lower liberal subculture. If the dominate liberal whole makes a claim, the subculture will in turn unconditionally submit to it. Envision if you will, an abused other whom seeks to rationalize their abuse in terms of their own inadequacies. Hence is the new liberal subculture. The inept view of self has allowed its exploitation to a social order that is granted the perception of power for being more competent and more responsible than that of the individual self.
"More or less, Conservatism, mothered by the Republican Party and Fathered by the Democrat Party, currently suffers an Oedipus complex in that Conservatives wish to destroy Democrats while they harbor a perverse attraction to the Republican political elite."
Here is a way of looking at one aspect, perhaps the largest aspect, of the Obama Administration.If your household is consumed by debt, you do not seek to correct the problem by assuming even more debt.Yet, America is being told things are getting better in areas where it is completely impossible for them to improve given the Obama Administration’s refusal to assume a role of fiscal responsibility that would be of benefit to the people.
Have things really gotten that bad?Is the Republican interpretation of Americanism so distorted, the American people are more willing to surrender the U.S. Constitution to the Obama regime?Is the lesser evil of submitting to full government control really a more promising voter prospect than allowing the Republican political elite to continue their current course of action?Moreover, when will Americans begin to recognize "Republicanism” as the counter intuitive conservative political ideology that today’s Republican elite have turned it into?
To many, Barak Obama is a great president. Denial. Mitt Romney for others, represents a return to a better America. Denial. Herman Cain is (somehow) the Tea Party favorite. Denial. Americans, desperate to hide from political truth, use denial to provide themselves with a false sense of security in hopes a better future will magically blossom from blind hope - and the efforts of the more aware and more assertive American. The truth is as obvious as it is a lonely reality.
It is not that supporters are unaware of Santorum’s or other candidate’s fiscal histories; it is that so many are actually indifferent to fiscal history while staking claim to the call for a fiscally responsible president.
As of late, the Right insists on challenging the norm of America’s political elite.
Fewer than half of Americans pay taxes, forcing more than half to now pay taxes while disposing of the income tax return economically imperials more than 50% of a nation which has a suffering economy; 70% of which is driven by consumer spending.
